Last modified: 2010-05-15 16:03:44 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T16782, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 14782 - Templates in edit summary replaced by low level code for new page
Templates in edit summary replaced by low level code for new page
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
1.13.x
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-07-10 13:25 UTC by ABX
Modified: 2010-05-15 16:03 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description ABX 2008-07-10 13:25:38 UTC
== Old edit summary ==
When edit summary was empty then content of it was replaced by content typed for article. When I typed in new page "{{Bez infoboxu|Artysta muzyczny}}" then edit summary looked like:

Nowa strona: {{Bez infoboxu|Artysta muzyczny}}
http://pl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dyskusja:Andrzej_Krai%C5%84ski&action=history 

== New edit summary ==
Code of template, with all its decorations is pasted right into edit summary. When I typed "{{bez infoboksu|Piłkarz}}" in new page, text in edit summary is substituted by template code. It looks like:

Nowa strona: <table style="" class="metadata plainlinks ambox ambox-style"> <tr> <td class="ambox-image"> <div style="width:52px;">30px</div></td> <td class="ambox-text">'''Ten artykuł wyma)
http://pl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dyskusja:Marek_Motyka&action=history

New behaviour is unreadable because meaning of new page is made by template name and its parameters.
Comment 1 Brion Vibber 2008-07-10 22:57:43 UTC
Seems fine currently; may have been one of the recent message regressions which has been undone.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links