Last modified: 2008-08-22 18:54:16 UTC
It would make some things more comfortable if in Special:Contributions, you could see for current edits whether they are sighted or not. More presice: If an edit is shown as top, but is not flagged and from a namespace where flagging is possible, show a red exclamation mark.
Hmm, I'm not sure how much use this would again. It would add another JOIN, which isn't much, but needs justification.
This makes is much easier to look at contributions from specific noneditors. After you see a noneditor make a contribution, you can then look at all his contribs and see if there is immediate need of further sighting, without looking at diffs.
Done in r37793. This is for all revs, not just "top".
The current version of FlaggedRevs only indicates if a single version has been marked. But it does not show if there are already newer revs that has been sighted, or if the article currently is completely unreviewed. In both cases there is no „immediate need of further sighting“. Maybe it is possible to add those red exclamation marks, known from the watchlist or the Recent changes, to user contributions, too.
Done with highlighting (to avoid confusion with patrollable non-reviewable namespaces) in r39674.
Could you please reactivate the class for sighted revisions (default: highlighted) and maybe also add a class (default: display:none) for edits at unreviewed pages. Currently only draft versions are highlighted. A user don't know which versions are already checked for vandalism: Every not highlighted version could be a reverted one, an edit to an unreviewed page or a sighted edit. Currently it takes more time to check all edits of a new user briefly. Some German discussions took place at: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FzW#Frage_zum_Layout_der_.27Benutzerbeitr.C3.A4ge.27
(In reply to comment #6) > (default: display:none) Sorry. What i wanted to write was of course: (default: background:none)
I'd prefer not to join on another table for this. Would it be OK to just highlight the unreviewed pages with a different class (without backgroind:none)?
Unreviewed pages highlighted now, r39846. I'd rather not do highlighting for that status of each edit, as it is a bit messier and requires an extra join (there already is one for the current behavoir). Also, the original request for this bug doesn't mention that.
