Last modified: 2011-04-14 15:13:26 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T19246, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 17246 - Unify parameter names for various listings.
Unify parameter names for various listings.
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Special pages (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low enhancement with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2009-01-30 13:00 UTC by Purodha Blissenbach
Modified: 2011-04-14 15:13 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Purodha Blissenbach 2009-01-30 13:00:57 UTC
There are several lists having individual parameters like "from=", "offset=", "limit=" etc. which may, or may not exist, expecting a variety of either counts, or names/titles/record-id/timestamps/goups names, or other. Some can, some cannot be as well be submitted via a Special:Pagename/start syntax.

So as to ease the use of special pages parameters, I'd suggest to find identical names for identical usage throughout all such pages, including the ubiqutous possibility to arbitrarily use both names and entry numbers to start a listing from, and to end a listing at. Also, it would be wise to report wrong or unsopported parameters instead of silently igoring them.

This would imho best be taken care of by moving the "standard" parameter treatment into a subroutine, and giving each special page the opportunity to parameterize it, as to which ones are
supported. This would also help to i18n the parameter names.
Comment 1 Niklas Laxström 2009-02-21 08:28:46 UTC
> This would also help to i18n the parameter names.

I don't think this is the way we want to go.
Comment 2 Purodha Blissenbach 2010-07-29 12:17:15 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> I don't think this is the way we want to go.

We do i18n the special page names (btw. I hate this) why not also their parameters? Noone is forced to use the i18ned versions of names, anyways.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links