Last modified: 2009-03-10 03:57:10 UTC
After a user is blocked with the "Hide username from the block log, active block list and user list" option on, they no longer appear in CU results. This should certainly *not* be the case, as our most disruptive users are blocked with that option - the exact same users we are most likely to need CU data for.
The offending user's edits and log entries should still be there. Is there an example of this?
(In reply to comment #1) > The offending user's edits and log entries should still be there. Is there an > example of this? > There was one last night (how I figured this out), but I can't recall which one it is, and there are too many accounts spread over too many wikis to figure out which is was without a serious investment of time and energy. I'll perhaps do a test on testwiki.
Is the issue just the "user is blocked" notice? Fixed that in r48155.
(In reply to comment #3) > Is the issue just the "user is blocked" notice? Fixed that in r48155. > No, I blocked the user then ran a CU & got no results at all - not even the account creation. After that, did CU before blocking.
(In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Is the issue just the "user is blocked" notice? Fixed that in r48155. > > > > No, I blocked the user then ran a CU & got no results at all - not even the > account creation. After that, did CU before blocking. > This doesn't seem related to the block option.
(In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #3) > > > Is the issue just the "user is blocked" notice? Fixed that in r48155. > > > > > > > No, I blocked the user then ran a CU & got no results at all - not even the > > account creation. After that, did CU before blocking. > > > > This doesn't seem related to the block option. > You're right, I can't replicate this. Marked as WORKSFORME & I'll see if I can figure out what this really was.