Last modified: 2009-06-18 11:31:47 UTC
Articles created by autoeditors are not marked as autoreviewed. This behavior started about 2009-06-15T04:16:34Z (http://ru.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=logevents&letype=review&lelimit=500&lestart=2009-06-15T04:15:59Z&ledir=newer) Also, checking the checkbox "Mark as reviewed" when editing an article doesn't make the article reviewed. The checkbox is available for editors.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1921 ***
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 19214 ***
I reopened this bug, because bug19214 was too long. Summarizing the problem: (In reply to comment #21) > Alas, some autoeditors edits are still not marked as autoreviewed, see > http://ru.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&prop=revisions&titles=Харлем&rvprop=user|comment|flags|flagged|ids&rvstartid=16464709&rvlimit=1, > for example. > And also other type of "autoeditor" have the same problem... (ru.wiki has users with special right - bug15478, pl.wiki has autopromoted users with 'autoreview' permission - r47252). Example: http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyskusja_wikipedysty:Mathiasrex - after code update, user's edits aren't marking as autoreviewed.
> Example: http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyskusja_wikipedysty:Mathiasrex - after Wrong link, correct is http://pl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Specjalna:Rejestr&type=review&user=Mathiasrex&page=&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&hide_patrol_log=1&hide_review_log=1
(In reply to comment #0) > Articles created by autoeditors are not marked as autoreviewed. This behavior > started about 2009-06-15T04:16:34Z > (http://ru.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=logevents&letype=review&lelimit=500&lestart=2009-06-15T04:15:59Z&ledir=newer) > Also, checking the checkbox "Mark as reviewed" when editing an article doesn't > make the article reviewed. The checkbox is available for editors. Does the checkbox not work for just autoeditors, or does it also effect regular editors?
I can't reproduce this issue on my local test wiki, possible fixed in r52075, I'll try and get a scap (code sync).
(In reply to comment #6) > I can't reproduce this issue on my local test wiki, possible fixed in r52075, > I'll try and get a scap (code sync). > You are right, probably issue has been fixed in r52075. Now it works correct.