Last modified: 2012-09-14 18:00:07 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #28081 +++ On Bug 27695 comment 0, Bawolff suggested the possibility of migrating from ReaderFeedback to ArticleFeedback on wikis which already have the extension installed. Some time before that, users from Portuguese Wikipedia have reached consensus about installing it on ptwiki as soon as it is available (see bug 28081) and users from other wikis have also asked about the possibility of use of AFT on their wikis (see e.g. [[mw:Thread:Talk:Article_feedback/Eswiki_article_feedback]]). A similar pool was also made on ptwikibooks and the users are favorable to switching from ReaderFeedback to ArticleFeedback extension. I don't know if the two extensions are similar enough to make it possible some kind of reuse of the data already collected by ReaderFeedback. If this is not the case, it would be good if the current data were exported to some table having at least the page names and average rating of the page. Would it be possible to do that? Per discussion on above URL, could someone setup the ArticleFeedback extension on Portuguese Wikibooks with the following configuration? ---- $wgArticleFeedbackCategories = array(); $wgArticleFeedbackNamespaces = array( NS_MAIN, NS_HELP, NS_PROJECT ); $wgArticleFeedbackLotteryOdds = 100; $wgArticleFeedbackDashboard = true; ----
I'm fairly sure there is no data migration path from Reader Feedback to Article Feedback
(In reply to comment #1) > I'm fairly sure there is no data migration path from Reader Feedback to Article > Feedback In this case, my previous question apply: (In reply to comment #0) > If this is not > the case, it would be good if the current data were exported to some table > having at least the page names and average rating of the page. Would it be > possible to do that? Would it be possible to provide some kind of dump file with the current ReaderFeedback data? Is this something to ask here or maybe on Database Queries service provided on Toolserver? https://jira.toolserver.org/browse/DBQ
Need to know what categories you want it enabling for. We can enable AF, disable reader feedback, and look at how we can get you the database tables you're interested in
(In reply to comment #3) > Need to know what categories you want it enabling for. On comment 0 I suggested to use ------------------- $wgArticleFeedbackLotteryOdds = 100; ------------------- so that all pages in the selected namespaces (NS_MAIN, NS_HELP, NS_PROJECT) could be rated. This is how it was done for enwiki, since we have ------------------- 'wmgArticleFeedbackLotteryOdds' => array( 'default' => 0, 'enwiki' => 100, ), ------------------- at http://noc.wikimedia.org/conf/highlight.php?file=InitialiseSettings.php > We can enable AF, disable reader feedback, and look at how we can get you the > database tables you're interested in I think that is ok. Should we open a separated bug for getting the data collected by ReaderFeedback extension?
(In reply to comment #4) > I think that is ok. Should we open a separated bug for getting the data > collected by ReaderFeedback extension? Please!
As you probably have noticed, ReaderFeedback has been disabled, ArticleFeedback has been enabled, but I'm seemingly waiting for a few caching things to hurry up. Will notify when finished
Fixed!
(In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > I think that is ok. Should we open a separated bug for getting the data > > collected by ReaderFeedback extension? > > Please! https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30427
