Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

In addition. Talk namespace should be:

english: "Incubator talk"
russian: "Обсуждение Инкубатора"

Yes, of course.

And russian alias "И", please.

And russian alias "И", please.

Why the delay ?

> Why the delay ?

Because we have limited resources and are in the middle of pushing out
a software release.  I'm adding Sam in the hopes that he'll be able to
get to this quicker.

Done

Please make both new namespaces 102 & 103 not indexed (I guess it's [[mw:Manual:$wgNamespaceRobotPolicies]]) - that was one of the reasons to create "Incubator" namespace.

Also please confirm that "replacing" WMF "incubator:" prefix (used for incubator.wikimedia.org) is not going to cause any problems (we already know we'll have to use "m:incubator:..." for WMF project).

(In reply to comment #8)
> Please make both new namespaces 102 & 103 not indexed (I guess it's
> [[mw:Manual:$wgNamespaceRobotPolicies]]) - that was one of the reasons to
> create "Incubator" namespace.
> 
> Also please confirm that "replacing" WMF "incubator:" prefix (used for
> incubator.wikimedia.org) is not going to cause any problems (we already know
> we'll have to use "m:incubator:..." for WMF project).

<iw prefix="incubator" local="" url="http://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/$1" />

Link for "Incubator talk" follows to mainspace (ns:0). E.g. if you click link "Обсуждение" ("Discussion") at page 
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Инкубатор:Тест 
you'll get page "Обсуждение Инкубатора:Тест" in ns:0 with new link "Обсуждение" ("Discussion") to "Обсуждение:Обсуждение Инкубатора:Тест"

(In reply to comment #8)
> Please make both new namespaces 102 & 103 not indexed (I guess it's
> [[mw:Manual:$wgNamespaceRobotPolicies]]) - that was one of the reasons to
> create "Incubator" namespace.
> 

Done

(In reply to comment #10)
> Link for "Incubator talk" follows to mainspace (ns:0). E.g. if you click link
> "Обсуждение" ("Discussion") at page 
> http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Инкубатор:Тест 
> you'll get page "Обсуждение Инкубатора:Тест" in ns:0 with new link "Обсуждение"
> ("Discussion") to "Обсуждение:Обсуждение Инкубатора:Тест"

http://ru.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&meta=siteinfo&siprop=general|namespaces|namespacealiases|statistics

WFM

> WFM

I do not understand you. The problem remains

(In reply to comment #12)
> > WFM
> 
> I do not understand you. The problem remains

And I don't understand what you're trying to tell me

The namespace is created, the english aliases are in place, as is shown by http://ru.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&meta=siteinfo&siprop=general|namespaces|namespacealiases|statistics

Hence, this is Works For Me

My fault, typo in config (space instead of _)

Confirmed with vvv on IRC that is now fixed

Incubator Talk is still indexed on mobile version ru.m.wikipedia.org : https://www.google.ru/search?q=site:wikipedia.org+%D0%9E%D0%B1%D1%81%D1%83%D0%B6%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5+%D0%98%D0%BD%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B0#q=site:wikipedia.org+%D0%9E%D0%B1%D1%81%D1%83%D0%B6%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5+%D0%98%D0%BD%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B0&hl=ru&newwindow=1&prmd=imvns&ei=Z1XkT7x7iPT6BsPG1LoK&start=20&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=f50f8b144677fa6a&biw=1280&bih=909

Please close it too.

Incubator Talk (103) namespace is currently configured in noindex, follow:

'wgNamespaceRobotPolicies' => array(
...,
'ruwiki' => array(
    ...,
    103 => 'noindex,follow',
    ...
),
...
)

If I open a incubator talk page, like [[ru:Обсуждение Инкубатора:+800, рок-группа]], I get the following information in metatags:
<meta name="robots" content="noindex,follow" />

So I guess, this is old Google indexing, not yet trimmed from their cache.

CC'ing Gryllida who's going to confirm with the community if everything's OK. I personally haven't been able to find Google results for a randomly tested page in the Incubator namespace, and the meta tags appear correct.

Expect this bug to be closed in a couple of days.

And so I'm closing it; the code for the 103 namespace is there, and I haven't been able to reproduce the behaviour from comment 15, so there's no need to have this bug open any longer.