Last modified: 2012-01-10 21:42:53 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T33807, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 31807 - Firefox 9 dropped navigator.taintEnabled()
Firefox 9 dropped navigator.taintEnabled()
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Unprioritized normal with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://bfwiki.tellefsen.net/index.php...
: javascript
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2011-10-18 20:33 UTC by j.j.
Modified: 2012-01-10 21:42 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: Other
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description j.j. 2011-10-18 20:33:15 UTC
We have a bug report for Auora 9 (Firefox 9) for some MediaWiki pages. See
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695337

This is likely because the method "navigator.taintEnabled()" was dropped. 
You use this (or used this in older versions?) to detect Firefox.
See our bug for an example of a now broken wiki page. Just for your information.

It might be not an issue in your latest versions, but you might consider to inform users that things will brake with version x and Firefox 9.

Firefox 9 final ships 2011-12-20.
It's currently on Aurora channel:
http://www.mozilla.org/firefox/channel/
http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/channel/ 

Thanks!
Comment 1 Daniel Friesen 2011-10-18 20:50:43 UTC
I can't find any reference to taintEnabled in trunk.
Comment 2 j.j. 2011-10-18 23:04:11 UTC
oops, I see a lot info in another Mozilla bug. According
  https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683151#c8
this was fixed in MediaWiki 1.16, released 2010-07-28.
Comment 3 Daniel Friesen 2011-10-18 23:07:31 UTC
;) well then, looks like it was "fixed".

Btw, pre-1.16 is obsolete, and 1.16 itself goes obsolete next month. And by obsolete, I mean they don't get security releases and plenty of extension authors stop bothering to support said versions.
Comment 4 Bawolff (Brian Wolff) 2012-01-05 02:01:06 UTC
btw, for those curious, this was r53141

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links