Last modified: 2011-12-09 21:36:18 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T34880, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 32880 - Loops: License?
Loops: License?
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
Other (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Unprioritized normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Daniel A. R. Werner
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2011-12-08 21:00 UTC by Van de Bugger
Modified: 2011-12-09 21:36 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Van de Bugger 2011-12-08 21:00:16 UTC 
Loops.php:  

> * @license: GNU GPL v2 or higher

README:

> == About ==
>
> The 'Loops' extension Enhances the parser with parser functions to perform loops.
> It is not compatible with MediaWiki versions below 1.12.
> 
> * Website: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Loops
> * Authors:  David M. Sledge, Daniel Werner < danweetz@web.de >
> * License: ISC license

What the license for Loop? GPLv2+ or ISC?
Comment 1 Daniel A. R. Werner 2011-12-08 22:00:31 UTC 
I guess David M. Sledge but it under GPLv2+ back then, the ISC must have slipped in there, my fault.
So, GPL v2+ it is in r105595.
Comment 2 Van de Bugger 2011-12-09 18:50:47 UTC 
Verified on r105689.
Comment 3 Daniel A. R. Werner 2011-12-09 20:16:07 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> Verified on r105689.
That's Parser Fun 0.2 ^^
I think you meant verified on r105609
Comment 4 Van de Bugger 2011-12-09 20:28:26 UTC 
> $ cd Loops
> $ svn update
> U    Loops.php
> U    README
> Updated to revision 105689.

The required fix is in r105689 for sure, and, probably, even earlier. I did not look for a specific revision where the change occurred.
Comment 5 Daniel A. R. Werner 2011-12-09 21:36:18 UTC 
sorry, now I get it
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links