Last modified: 2013-06-21 22:44:19 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T35292, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 33292 - Number of files in an inconsistent deletion state
Number of files in an inconsistent deletion state
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Page deletion (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_ta...
: platformeng
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2011-12-21 04:19 UTC by carnildo
Modified: 2013-06-21 22:44 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description carnildo 2011-12-21 04:19:40 UTC
As of Dec 21 04:03:51 UTC, the file https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:RAF_logo.svg is in an inconsistent state:

* Viewing the page shows an image with two uploads in the history. and no image description text.
* Viewing https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:RAF_logo.svg&action=history shows no revision history and states that the page has been deleted.
* Viewing http://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&format=xml&prop=imageinfo&titles=File:RAF%20logo.svg&iilimit=10 gives results indicating a deleted image (missing='') with two versions of the image uploaded.
* Viewing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Undelete/File:RAF_logo.svg shows a deletion log with two entries from Dec 21 02:57 UTC: one deleting an old revision of the file, and one deleting unspecified content, as well as eight revisions of the image description text.
* The file shows up in pages that use it.
Comment 1 Mark A. Hershberger 2011-12-21 06:08:22 UTC
tagging for platformeng to look at.
Comment 2 Skier Dude 2012-02-24 05:40:28 UTC
Issue was discussed at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Database_error_-_can.27t_tell_if_deletion_worked_or_not 
Files in question were 
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:NIPPSS1.jpg
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Amethyst_bradley_ralani.JPG
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Andrew_Weinreich_in_2010.jpg
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Church.gif
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Along_the_Shore,_New_Castle,_NH.jpg

For my, the error received was "Last attempted database query: (SQL query hidden) - Function: LocalFileRestoreBatch::execute" - I was not able to purge the cache in two different browsers (FF & IE) and needed another sysop to complete the deletions.  What appears is only the image on the page, no page history, no image history, just the most recent image.
Comment 3 carnildo 2012-02-26 22:14:17 UTC
I've found another 130 files with this problem.  Full list is at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ImageRemovalBot/badfiles
Comment 4 carnildo 2012-02-28 20:55:19 UTC
Added another 23, all deleted yesterday.
Comment 5 Skier Dude 2012-03-09 06:46:26 UTC
Example of lengthy error message received when this happened: 

A database error has occurred. Did you forget to run maintenance/update.php after upgrading? See: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Upgrading#Run_the_update_script
Query: INSERT INTO `image` (img_name,img_size,img_width,img_height,img_metadata,img_bits,img_media_type,img_major_mime,img_minor_mime,img_description,img_user,img_user_text,img_timestamp,img_sha1) VALUES ('Henderson_county_kentucky_courthouse.jpg','624879','2048','1536','a:34:{s:16:\"ImageDescription\";s:31:\"OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA \";s:4:\"Make\";s:19:\"OLYMPUS CORPORATION\";s:5:\"Model\";s:16:\"X100,D540Z,C310Z\";s:11:\"Orientation\";i:1;s:11:\"XResolution\";s:4:\"72/1\";s:11:\"YResolution\";s:4:\"72/1\";s:14:\"ResolutionUnit\";i:2;s:8:\"Software\";s:8:\"v775u-77\";s:8:\"DateTime\";s:19:\"0000:00:00 00:00:00\";s:16:\"YCbCrPositioning\";i:2;s:12:\"ExposureTime\";s:7:\"10/3200\";s:7:\"FNumber\";s:5:\"29/10\";s:15:\"ExposureProgram\";i:2;s:15:\"ISOSpeedRatings\";i:70;s:11:\"ExifVersion\";s:4:\"0220\";s:16:\"DateTimeOriginal\";s:19:\"0000:00:00 00:00:00\";s:17:\"DateTimeDigitized\";s:19:\"0000:00:00 00:00:00\";s:22:\"CompressedBitsPerPixel\";s:3:\"2/1\";s:17:\"ExposureBiasValue\";s:4:\"0/10\";s:16:\"MaxApertureValue\";s:5:\"29/10\";s:12:\"MeteringMode\";i:5;s:11:\"LightSource\";i:0;s:5:\"Flash\";i:9;s:11:\"FocalLength\";s:5:\"58/10\";s:10:\"ColorSpace\";i:1;s:14:\"CustomRendered\";i:0;s:12:\"ExposureMode\";i:0;s:12:\"WhiteBalance\";i:0;s:16:\"DigitalZoomRatio\";s:5:\"0/100\";s:16:\"SceneCaptureType\";i:0;s:8:\"Contrast\";i:0;s:10:\"Saturation\";i:0;s:9:\"Sharpness\";i:0;s:22:\"MEDIAWIKI_EXIF_VERSION\";i:1;}','8','BITMAP','image','jpeg','[[Henderson County, Kentucky]] courthouse\n\n[[Category:Images of Henderson County, Kentucky]]','256457','Bedford','20080609174754','g7ancifc9oyy4deupk6vzau48wqihtq')
Function: LocalFileRestoreBatch::execute
Error: 1062 Duplicate entry 'Henderson_county_kentucky_courthouse.jpg' for key 'PRIMARY' (10.0.6.48)
Comment 6 Andre Klapper 2013-03-11 16:47:39 UTC
Example in comment 0 seems to work correctly now (but I cannot check the deletion log).

Does this only refer to files on English Wikipedia, or are there also examples for "bad files" on Commons? Is there any chance

As https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ImageRemovalBot/badfiles was last updated on 28 February 2012 it would be good to know if new cases of this problem are still created or not.
Comment 7 carnildo 2013-03-11 21:20:10 UTC
The most recent images I could find that are definitely affected are

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Picture_470.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Zeynep_Ucbasaran_01.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1IC8.png

from 17 November 2012.  ImageRemovalBot identified https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Khuda_Aur_Muhabbat.jpg from 6 February 2013 as problematic, but I can't verify it.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links