Last modified: 2011-12-29 07:36:47 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T35382, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 33382 - Files used in CR comments don't get listed as being used on wiki on file description pages
Files used in CR comments don't get listed as being used on wiki on file desc...
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
CodeReview (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2011-12-27 05:41 UTC by p858snake
Modified: 2011-12-29 07:36 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description p858snake 2011-12-27 05:41:26 UTC
Files used in CR comments don't get listed as being used on wiki on file description pages
Comment 1 Bawolff (Brian Wolff) 2011-12-27 05:52:05 UTC
Special pages don't exactly have article ids we can stuff in imagelinks.il_from
Comment 2 Krinkle 2011-12-27 21:48:18 UTC
I heard ideas for the long term to have CodeReview comments go into a LiquidThread instead (iirc the new LQT will have the ability for threads that don't have a wiki page as host), which should make this possible (assuming they are still in the thread namespace).

But then again for the other long term, we won't use CodeReview at all after the switch to Git, right ?
Comment 3 Sam Reed (reedy) 2011-12-27 21:58:28 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> I heard ideas for the long term to have CodeReview comments go into a
> LiquidThread instead (iirc the new LQT will have the ability for threads that
> don't have a wiki page as host), which should make this possible (assuming they
> are still in the thread namespace).
> 
> But then again for the other long term, we won't use CodeReview at all after
> the switch to Git, right ?

Indeed. I've backed off on doing CR development, features at least...
Comment 4 MZMcBride 2011-12-29 06:50:50 UTC
I'd consider the relationship between CodeReview and an image repo (foreign or not) to be roughly the equivalent of mywikisite.org and a foreign file repo like Wikimedia Commons. We don't (and won't) track file usage on foreign wikis. Similarly, I don't think it's necessary to track file usage in CodeReview comments. I'd recommend "wontfix" or "invalid" here.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links