Last modified: 2014-11-18 18:07:30 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T35412, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 33412 - No notification of concurrent reviews on special pages
No notification of concurrent reviews on special pages
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
FlaggedRevs (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: High minor with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2011-12-29 12:18 UTC by Tisza Gergő
Modified: 2014-11-18 18:07 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Tisza Gergő 2011-12-29 12:18:49 UTC 
On [[Special:OldReviewedPages]]/[[Special:UnreviewedPages]], there used to be an (under review) label next to edits when someone clicked on the (review) link in the last few minutes. This was useful for reviewers to avoid working on the same page an thus wasting time and effort. This seems to have disappeared recently.
Comment 1 Aaron Schulz 2011-12-29 17:47:13 UTC 
They are still there. Clicking (review) does not automatically added the notice. You have to click the "advertise as reviewing" link thingy on the review form to show the notice on the special pages.
Comment 2 Tisza Gergő 2011-12-29 20:44:35 UTC 
Thanks Aaron, didn't notice that! Is there some way to set advertising as the default?
Comment 3 Aaron Schulz 2011-12-29 20:57:43 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> Thanks Aaron, didn't notice that! Is there some way to set advertising as the
> default?

One could do it via site JS (fire the link onload).
Comment 4 Aaron Schulz 2012-01-03 19:03:04 UTC 
Closing, as this was an intentional change. See bug 25295.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links