Last modified: 2012-02-24 02:52:04 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T35749, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 33749 - Translation: History should be "Versionsgeschichte", not "Verlauf"
Translation: History should be "Versionsgeschichte", not "Verlauf"
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Product: Wikipedia App
Classification: Unclassified
Generic (Other open bugs)
1.0.0 (Android)
All All
: Low normal
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
: i18n
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2012-01-16 09:31 UTC by Johannes Rohr
Modified: 2012-02-24 02:52 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: Android
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Johannes Rohr 2012-01-16 09:31:08 UTC
Presently, the history button is labelled "Verlauf". This is misleading, as this word is typically used for browsing history, and this is what people expect to find here, just tested with several people. 

The expression used in Mediawiki for article history is "Versionsgeschichte". If that's too long, just use "Versionen". But I would not recommend leaving it as "Verlauf".
Comment 1 Niklas Laxström 2012-01-16 09:32:24 UTC
FYI: You can update translations at translatewiki.net.
Comment 3 Amir E. Aharoni 2012-01-20 09:29:15 UTC
I may misunderstand something, but this button does show the browsing history in this app. Should it be "Verlauf" then?
Comment 4 Johannes Rohr 2012-01-20 09:58:55 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> I may misunderstand something, but this button does show the browsing history
> in this app. Should it be "Verlauf" then?

Yes, you are right. Sorry. For me the button did not work at all, so my guess was that it was actually meant to display the editing history.

Well, if it is not, I wonder whether the app is actually license compliant, when there is no way of looking up the actual authors.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links