Last modified: 2012-02-01 21:31:30 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T35947, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 33947 - Useless/misleading column "description" in [[Special:ListFiles]]
Useless/misleading column "description" in [[Special:ListFiles]]
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Special pages (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on: 32446
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2012-01-25 14:36 UTC by Rainer Rillke @commons.wikimedia
Modified: 2012-02-01 21:31 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Rainer Rillke @commons.wikimedia 2012-01-25 14:36:37 UTC
Useless/misleading column "description" in [[Special:ListFiles]]:

This column actually contains the "upload summary" or in case of upload-wizard-uploads -- nothing.

Only in case of re-uploads it may contain useful stuff. Nevertheless it would be better to have the wikitext of the file in there or its decription only. The latter might be not feasable because of different templates used on different projects.
Comment 1 Bawolff (Brian Wolff) 2012-01-25 15:24:28 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> Useless/misleading column "description" in [[Special:ListFiles]]:
> 
> This column actually contains the "upload summary" or in case of
> upload-wizard-uploads -- nothing.
> 
> Only in case of re-uploads it may contain useful stuff. Nevertheless it would
> be better to have the wikitext of the file in there or its decription only. The
> latter might be not feasable because of different templates used on different
> projects.

/me is of the opinion that upload-wizard is broken in the regard of not putting anything in that field... There's a bug for that somewhere

Having the wikitext of the image description page might be a possibility, extracting the "description" from the template and putting it there is not likely to happen until we have some sort of machine understandable way of marking up data on the description page. (Which people apparently have pipe-dreamish plans of doing at some point, but is probably a long way off)
Comment 2 Maury Markowitz 2012-02-01 17:53:32 UTC
There's some oddity here that should be considered. Scroll down this list:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/Maury_Markowitz

Notice that the ones near the bottom DO contain the description? Not perfect, but useful.

Is this a regression problem?
Comment 3 Bawolff (Brian Wolff) 2012-02-01 21:31:30 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> There's some oddity here that should be considered. Scroll down this list:
> 
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/Maury_Markowitz
> 
> Notice that the ones near the bottom DO contain the description? Not perfect,
> but useful.
> 
> Is this a regression problem?

Those do not appear to be uploaded with upload wizard. See bug 32446

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links