Last modified: 2013-03-05 11:47:55 UTC
Currently 52 items, 50 being JS files Would be nice to categorise them with sub folders somewhat
Yes, We can try grouping by languages. That will also grow over a period of time , but better than all js in single folder.
Isn't it already categorised now?
(In reply to comment #2) > Isn't it already categorised now? In the resources folder there are 53 javascript files and 2 directories
(In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Isn't it already categorised now? > > In the resources folder there are 53 javascript files and 2 directories Not on my revision. There are 11 directories and only one js file. You should update your copy of svn.
(In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > Isn't it already categorised now? > > > > In the resources folder there are 53 javascript files and 2 directories > > Not on my revision. There are 11 directories and only one js file. You should > update your copy of svn. No idea what you're looking at... See svn trunk http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/mediawiki/trunk/extensions/Narayam/resources/
We're not subdividing phase3/languages/messages, either are we? File naming is very consistent. I'd say WONTFIX unless there's a strong technical reason to do so.
Moving files right now would cause lots of inconvenience for merging fixes back to release branches.
62 JS files now. Removing deprecated LATER resolution. In case you think that fixing this is not a good idea, please close this again as RESOLVED WONTFIX.
We are currently maintaining the resources here: https://github.com/wikimedia/jquery.ime I am closing this bug. Please feel free to reopen if you think it still needs attention. Thanks.
Runa: What does the content of https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/gitweb?p=mediawiki/extensions/Narayam.git;a=tree;f=resources;h=106abc9be19f985a6153d24e67262fbe97190c3d;hb=refs/heads/master do then? Is it obsolete or not?
The Language Engineering Team is doing only high priority bug fixes for Narayam and WebFonts. Development work is done on the Universal Language Selector extensions, which will replace those two extensions at some point.
Niklas: I know that, and it's unrelated to my question in comment 10, so my question in comment 10 still stands. WONTFIX means "we are against fixing this", not "lowest priority".
(In reply to comment #10) > Runa: What does the content of > https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/gitweb?p=mediawiki/extensions/Narayam.git; > a=tree;f=resources;h=106abc9be19f985a6153d24e67262fbe97190c3d;hb=refs/heads/ > master > do then? Is it obsolete or not? This content contains key mapping rules. See https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Narayam#Developing_a_key_mapping for the nitty gritty.
Andre: I see no benefit for spending effort for this bug (including code review), hence I think wontfix is appropriate.
