Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T36840, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.

From: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fragen_zur_Wikipedia#MW1.19:_Problem_-_Fettes_.22automatisch_gesichtet.22
--

https://bits.wikimedia.org/de.wikipedia.org/load.php?debug=true&lang=de&modules=ext.flaggedRevs.basic&only=styles&skin=monobook&*
contains

.fr-hist-basic-user, .fr-hist-quality-user, .fr-hist-basic-auto, .fr-hist-quality-auto {
    font-weight: bold;
}

That is bug too bold for the version histories. The message [[MediaWiki:revreview-hist-basic-auto]] is not really that important that is justifies a BOLD text. See https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lovedale&action=history&debug=true&uselang=qqx

So this request is to simply remove the "font-weight: bold" CSS?

It used to be smaller text and bold, now it's normal text and bold, which is an
overkill, so I would say - let's drop "font-weight: bold" for this.

CSS removed in r112776.