Last modified: 2013-10-25 10:17:36 UTC
There is consensus for the extension FlaggedRevs be applied in some articles, as if it were a protection in the article. It has to do this? You can do this: In articles with a particular category, the extension could be placed. So, just add the category and the extension will be running in the article. Consensus: https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipédia:Esplanada/propostas/Bloqueio_de_páginas_sistematicamente_vandalizadas_(18fev2012) Sorry for bad English Pedroca cerebral
There is currently no way to enable FlaggedRevs only for pages in certain categories. However, whether the stable or latest version is shown to readers is configuration per page (Special:Stabilization). If such a feature did exist, there would at least need to be a restriction that non-privileged users would not be allowed to remove those categories from pages. Templates that add such categories to pages they use would also need some sort of protection. It might be better to just have a bot set Special:Stabilization for the pages in the categories.
(In reply to comment #1) > There is currently no way to enable FlaggedRevs only for pages in certain > categories. However, whether the stable or latest version is shown to readers > is configuration per page (Special:Stabilization). > > If such a feature did exist, there would at least need to be a restriction that > non-privileged users would not be allowed to remove those categories from > pages. Templates that add such categories to pages they use would also need > some sort of protection. > > It might be better to just have a bot set Special:Stabilization for the pages > in the categories. I do not know if that's what you wrote, I just want an extension that can be configured on the page and not the entire Wikipedia. Thus, if a page is very vandalized, may be placed on the page.
The point being, enable FlaggedRevs for PTwiki.
With FlaggedRevs you can make all pages in certain namespaces (not categories) reviewable, meaning people mark versions in the history as "accepted". On a per-page basis, you can have *some* pages have non-accepted (or "pending edits" in other words) edits show to readers and *others* have only accepted edits show to readers. In any case, all versions can be viewed by looking through the page history (?action=history).
Well, basically the consensus is to enable "pending edits" for some pages.
Please reopen when you know what you want doing
I believe this is what bug 54828 was about. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 54828 ***
