Last modified: 2014-09-23 17:32:32 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T37476, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 35476 - Non-included tables break parser
Non-included tables break parser
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Templates (Other open bugs)
1.19.2
All All
: Normal major with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://test.bachsau.com/mediawiki/ind...
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2012-03-26 02:17 UTC by Bachsau
Modified: 2014-09-23 17:32 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Bachsau 2012-03-26 02:17:02 UTC
If a template uses tables for description, it can't be used in tables itself, even if those tables are inside <noinclude> tags.
Comment 1 Mark A. Hershberger 2012-03-26 17:11:20 UTC
Could you provide an example of this?
Comment 2 Bachsau 2012-03-26 17:41:51 UTC
Let's assume we have a template "Template:Key":
http://pastebin.com/d7bkRAYv

And the template "Template:Key/Description":
http://pastebin.com/5PJKStN4

Now, if you look at Template:Key/Description (save twice!) or paste it's code elsewhere on the wiki, the table isn't rendered anymore.
Comment 3 Bachsau 2012-03-26 17:45:45 UTC
PS: The other Key-Subtemplates featured on the description page just contain this like {{Key|Some text}}
Comment 4 Bachsau 2012-03-28 06:13:15 UTC
I set up a test site. Live bug view:

http://test.bachsau.com/mediawiki/index.php?title=Template:Bug
http://test.bachsau.com/mediawiki/index.php?title=Template:Bug2

You can also test the bug, as the whole installation is meant for testing, and it doesn't matter which pages you edit.
Comment 5 Bachsau 2014-09-23 13:52:36 UTC
Well, de-prioritising bugs open since 2012 instead of fixing them is really the best way to solve problems, I think. :/
Comment 6 Andre Klapper 2014-09-23 16:52:26 UTC
Bachsau: You moved the priority yourself up from 'normal' to 'high'. 
I reverted that as priority is meant to reflect reality and as I have seen no signs here that you plan to work on fixing this ticket. You are very welcome to bump it up to "high" again if you are working on a patch. See
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/How_to_become_a_MediaWiki_hacker for more info.
Comment 7 Bachsau 2014-09-23 17:32:32 UTC
If I'd plan on fixing this myself I hadn't reported it as a bug. Sure I'm a registered developer, but not a core developer, and I don't habe time do to complex work for every possible software.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links