Last modified: 2014-02-26 15:37:35 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T37935, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 35935 - Special:Version no longer comparable due to non sequential git style version numbers
Special:Version no longer comparable due to non sequential git style version ...
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Special pages (Other open bugs)
1.20.x
All All
: Lowest enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://transgender-taiwan.org/index.p...
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2012-04-12 23:48 UTC by Dan Jacobson
Modified: 2014-02-26 15:37 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Dan Jacobson 2012-04-12 23:48:44 UTC
Now with git version numbers one cannot tell which wiki is newer.
Where in the history of software is there a version command that doesn't
let you figure out what version is newer?
Takes much of the point out of the version command.
Worse is on the surface one still thinks these new hex numbers are in
order, and still tries to compare them.
Please add some additional information to the output, like some date.
Don't expect the browsing public to know how to contact some server to
get this information.
Comment 1 Dan Jacobson 2012-04-13 01:45:43 UTC
OK, now that there is a link to e.g., https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/gitweb?p=mediawiki/core.git;h=085367d5ac042fa56be1fe1d4b259d3f96275108
that is better. However perhaps a date could be shown without requiring a click.
Also say that is the upstream date, not the date the wikisysop copied it to disk.
Comment 2 Chad H. 2012-04-17 17:37:19 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> Now with git version numbers one cannot tell which wiki is newer.
> Where in the history of software is there a version command that doesn't
> let you figure out what version is newer?
> Takes much of the point out of the version command.

`git log` will show you the history. Your assumption that git does not support this is flawed.

> Worse is on the surface one still thinks these new hex numbers are in
> order, and still tries to compare them.

Who thinks that?
Comment 3 Dan Jacobson 2012-04-17 21:40:02 UTC
I did write Comment 1 too you know.
Comment 4 Platonides 2012-04-17 21:47:38 UTC
Note that the date of that revision could be earlier than the tree if the tip was a cherry-pick.
Comment 5 Chad H. 2012-04-17 22:13:42 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> Note that the date of that revision could be earlier than the tree if the tip
> was a cherry-pick.

That's very true...I don't know of any way we could recognize the difference other than checking the remotes. Even then, it wouldn't be ideal :\
Comment 6 Nemo 2014-02-02 19:01:58 UTC
I don't understand, are git hashes even included at all currently? See bug 53335 comment 9.
Comment 7 Dan Jacobson 2014-02-04 15:50:42 UTC
OK now http://abj.jidanni.org/index.php?title=Special:Version says

MediaWiki 	1.23alpha (b59acb6)
2014-01-26T18:41:40

Which is good, but I would still add a mouseover upon the date,
saying if it was when the administrator installed it on the current server, or when that commit was made.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links