Last modified: 2014-10-21 03:41:08 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T38091, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.

Bug 36091 - MathJax zoomed preview shouldn't be hidden when "click-dragged" on


Summary:	MathJax zoomed preview shouldn't be hidden when "click-dragged" on

Status:	REOPENED

Product:	MediaWiki extensions
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Math (Other open bugs)
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All All

Importance:	Normal normal (vote)
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Nobody - You can work on this!

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:	upstream

Duplicates:	36540 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2012-04-19 12:37 UTC by Waldir
Modified:	2014-10-21 03:41 UTC (History)
CC List:	7 users (show)

See Also:	https://github.com/mathjax/MathJax/issues/568
Web browser:	---
Mobile Platform:	---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Waldir 2012-04-19 12:37:00 UTC

Making the zoomed preview disappear with a single click either inside or outside the preview makes sense, since it minimizes user effort (no mouse movement required).

But one might want to select parts of the formula in the zoomed view, and this in fact should be fairly straightforward to implement (the same way click-drag is not used to show the zoomed formula in the first place).

Comment 1 Michael M. 2012-05-07 07:21:38 UTC

*** Bug 36540 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Andre Klapper 2012-10-21 02:53:37 UTC

Derk-Jan: As you set the "upstream" keyword: What is upstream in this case?
And what is the URL of the upstream bug report?

Comment 3 Andre Klapper 2012-11-08 12:33:30 UTC

Derk-Jan: As you set the "upstream" keyword: What is upstream in this case?
And what is the URL of the upstream bug report?

Comment 4 Frédéric Wang 2013-09-10 15:19:51 UTC

I've reported this upstream in case this was not done yet.

Comment 5 physikerwelt 2014-10-19 18:06:07 UTC

This should be fixed within MathJax.
If you think this is important feature reopen the bug and make it block 70207.

Comment 6 Waldir 2014-10-21 03:41:08 UTC

(In reply to physikerwelt from comment #5)
> This should be fixed within MathJax.
Sure, that's why it is marked "upstream". The bug hasn't been addressed yet, and no reason was presented for WONTFIXing it, so I'm reopening.

> and make it block 70207.
I don't see why this should block bug 70207 -- from a semantic point of view, they're orthogonal. Could you clarify your reasoning?

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Search

Personal tools

Navigation

Links