Last modified: 2012-05-08 13:55:04 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T38122, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 36122 - Templates shown should reflect the version of the page being edited
Templates shown should reflect the version of the page being edited
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Page editing (Other open bugs)
1.20.x
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2012-04-20 11:15 UTC by Malafaya
Modified: 2012-05-08 13:55 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Malafaya 2012-04-20 11:15:22 UTC
When editing an older revision of a page, the list of templates used on the page (shown below the edit section) lists the templates used in the latest/revision.

I believe this used to show the list of templates used in the revision being edited (I used to use it regularly in order to check older templates). I assume it happens in MW1.20, and not in MW1.19.

An example as of today:

When editing:

https://pt.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=%E1%83%AB%E1%83%90%E1%83%A6%E1%83%9A%E1%83%98&action=edit&oldid=1304005

shows templates "declinação" and "vertb" (for instance) as being used. But these templates are only used in the next revision (which is latest as of today):

https://pt.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=%E1%83%AB%E1%83%90%E1%83%A6%E1%83%9A%E1%83%98&action=edit&oldid=1304005

The contrary is also true. Editing older revision:

https://pt.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=noruegu%C3%AAs&action=edit&oldid=1347159

doesn't show template used in that revision named "flex.pt.ês" because it was removed in the current revision.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links