Last modified: 2012-07-19 23:08:47 UTC
My thinking; at the moment, the filtering functionality is limited by the fact that every filter is "unreviewed + N". There's no way of displaying just reviewed pages (useful if I'm undertaking oversight), or just nominated-for-deletion pages (useful if I'm an admin going through to baleet stuff). This can be solved by making "unreviewed" a filter, enabled by default but with the option to disable it. It would vastly increase the filtering permutations.
I think that's an excellent idea. I was experiencing the same issue and am glad that you filed that bug, along with the request to enable 'reviewed' and 'nominated for deletion' by default. I have given it a high priority and recommend we strive to make these changes this week, if possible, so they could be implemented by next week's deployment.
Thanks :). I think a similarly high-priority thing should be the issue with filters not saving between settings.
We could put 'unreviewed' as another filter under 'Include:' section, but the UI has to make sure that a user can't de-select both reviewed and unreviewed
Sounds fine from my POV. Deselecting all greys out the "set filters" button?
Fixed in: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/15845/
Grand! Thanks :)
deployed to production, mark as fixed
