Last modified: 2013-01-10 16:18:33 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T40588, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 38588 - result format Graph / #smwdoc support missing (1.8 alpha)
result format Graph / #smwdoc support missing (1.8 alpha)
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
SemanticResultFormats (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Unprioritized normal with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Jeroen De Dauw
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2012-07-22 23:32 UTC by [[kgh]]
Modified: 2013-01-10 16:18 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description [[kgh]] 2012-07-22 23:32:50 UTC
Adding {{#smwdoc:graph}} throws a fatal since 'graph' it is not among the allowed
values. It would be nice to have support for it.
Comment 1 MWJames 2012-09-15 07:04:16 UTC
I couldn't confirm this fatal but of course if the format is not activated it will show a message "The following error has been detected in your syntax:  Error " which is the intended message for non-registered formats.

In general, the graph format does not adhere the necessary code conventions introduced with SRF 1.8/1.7 which makes it more likely to cause problems with MW 1.19 or MW 1.20. Of course an end-user is free to activate the format by his/her own choosing but this format needs a major overhaul and as long as the format is in an unconfirmed stage, it should not be activated by default.
Comment 2 Jeroen De Dauw 2013-01-09 21:04:20 UTC
It does support it when the format is enabled
Comment 3 [[kgh]] 2013-01-10 16:18:33 UTC
Oops, I could have thought about this. Your were kind to me, but this one is thus a RESOLVED INVALID

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links