Last modified: 2013-07-09 10:44:20 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T41219, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 39219 - Gurumukhi LLA should have dot to the left of Gurumukhi LA
Gurumukhi LLA should have dot to the left of Gurumukhi LA
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
UniversalLanguageSelector (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
aklapper-moreinfo
: upstream
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2012-08-10 08:50 UTC by Shiju Alex
Modified: 2013-07-09 10:44 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Shiju Alex 2012-08-10 08:50:03 UTC
There is request from a Punjabi user mentioning that the letter that key N produces is wrong in Gurumukhi Inscript layout in Punjabi Wikipedia. Now the key N gives ਲ਼ (dot is after the character).

But accoring to him the dot should appear before character. Could you verify this. I have checked the Redhat Punjabi Inscript layout and few other images available on the web http://bit.ly/MXycoj. In many places it is as per current Narayam implementation 

The one place I saw an image as per user's suggestion is here http://www.5abi.com/dosh/fontU-dnld2.htm Could you verify this  and update the Gurumukhi Punjabi layout as per the accepted standards.
Comment 1 Srikanth Logic 2012-08-10 09:26:23 UTC
This is a font issue, filed a bug on Lohit-Punjabi. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847249
Comment 2 Srikanth Logic 2012-08-13 11:51:33 UTC
This issue needs to fixed with Unicode. http://unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0A00.pdf  U+0A33 is mentioned with dot on the left. Please provide any references(any govt documents?) to ascertain that the dot should be on the left.
Comment 3 Andre Klapper 2012-12-16 09:43:07 UTC
Shiju Alex: Please provide any references (any government documents?) to ascertain that the dot should be on the left.
Comment 4 Amir E. Aharoni 2013-06-13 21:47:09 UTC
Moving to ULS.
Comment 5 Siebrand Mazeland 2013-07-09 10:44:20 UTC
Closing this. The upstream issue was closed as not a bug. Per comment 2 and comment 3, before this actually is an issue, the unicode specification should support the request.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links