Last modified: 2013-04-09 21:51:21 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T41527, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 39527 - Add Autopatrolled group on Da.wikisource
Add Autopatrolled group on Da.wikisource
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Site requests (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
https://da.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikiso...
: community-consensus-needed
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2012-08-21 12:37 UTC by Simeon Dahl
Modified: 2013-04-09 21:51 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Simeon Dahl 2012-08-21 12:37:04 UTC
Hello. Can you please add a group called "Autopatrolled", so we dont need to check all there edits.

Link:https://da.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Skriptoriet#Autopatruljerede (gruppe)

Rights:

Autopatrolled: autopatrolled
Comment 1 Simeon Dahl 2012-08-21 12:51:01 UTC
Rember Administrator shal be able to add and remove Autopatrolled.
Comment 2 Marius Hoch 2012-08-22 16:07:37 UTC
Only one comment so far and I don't see any other users who edit so much that they couldn't be controlled per hand (on https://da.wikisource.org/wiki/Speciel:Seneste_%C3%A6ndringer), so I doubt this can be done now.
Comment 3 Dereckson 2012-09-22 21:58:45 UTC
[ Adding 'shellpolicy' keyword ]
Comment 4 Dereckson 2012-09-22 22:02:21 UTC
You could ask Peter Alberti and Sarrus to participate to the discussion, as they currently seem the most active users on your wiki.
Comment 5 Dereckson 2012-12-30 22:14:33 UTC
Any news?
Comment 6 Snowolf 2012-12-31 13:00:33 UTC
Peter Alberti did comment on it, according to google traslate, which seems incredibly coherent this morning, saying that "Personally I prefer to use recent changes rather than patrolling function as long as our wiki is so small. On the other hand let such a group to be fairly harmless, so I'm abstentions. Peter Alberti (Talk) 20 September 2012, 18:27 (UTC)".

I suggest that for the creation of a new group there should be broad consensus, more than just one person (the proposer) commenting on it in 4+ months.
Comment 7 Nemo 2013-04-09 21:51:21 UTC
Still no other supporters and nothing heard in over 4 months, closing.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links