Last modified: 2013-03-14 19:42:47 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T41553, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 39553 - UW fails on altitudes of rational numbers
UW fails on altitudes of rational numbers
Status: REOPENED
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
UploadWizard (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Lowest normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Co...
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2012-08-22 09:04 UTC by Derk-Jan Hartman
Modified: 2013-03-14 19:42 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Derk-Jan Hartman 2012-08-22 09:04:45 UTC
This is slightly related to bug 32410

These altitude numbers make the UW fail "But the UW considers an altitude not being a simple number to be a syntax error. So you have to change the altitude values, strip the /1 in simple cases or do the calculation in complicated cases"
Comment 1 Derk-Jan Hartman 2012-08-25 07:55:40 UTC
Interesting observation btw...


wikiText += '{{Location dec|'+ lat + '|' + lon + '|' + alt + '}}\n';

However location dec and geohack don't even support an altitude parameter, and definitely not in that format....
Comment 2 Derk-Jan Hartman 2012-08-25 08:14:12 UTC
Submitted a patch https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/21404 to simply not add Altitude to the UW for now. 2 big issues that make it sort of useless seems enough of an argument for that.
Comment 3 Erik Moeller 2012-08-27 22:49:33 UTC
It was pointed out here:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/commons-l/2012-June/006537.html

That we can express the altitude information as an information attribute in the last parameter of the location template, and that this was preferred to throwing it away. However, if we keep it, we do need to ensure that it doesn't ever trip the user.
Comment 4 Andre Klapper 2012-12-12 13:56:45 UTC
[Removing RESOLVED LATER as discussed in
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2012-November/064240.html .
Reopening and setting priority to "Lowest".
For future reference, please use either RESOLVED WONTFIX (for issues that will
not be fixed), or simply set lowest priority. Thanks a lot!]
Comment 5 Nischay Nahata 2013-03-14 19:42:47 UTC
The change got merged, is this fixed?

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links