Last modified: 2012-09-28 18:04:49 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T42593, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 40593 - Split single-sign-on account creation so users who disagree with labs account conditions can get Git access
Split single-sign-on account creation so users who disagree with labs account...
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Git/Gerrit (Other open bugs)
wmf-deployment
All All
: Unprioritized normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2012-09-28 12:10 UTC by Rainer Rillke @commons.wikimedia
Modified: 2012-09-28 18:04 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Rainer Rillke @commons.wikimedia 2012-09-28 12:10:49 UTC
Recently tried to get Git access but didn't agree to some points of the labs account conditions (and don't want it) but was told that I won't get Git access if I do not agree to these conditions.

Coding for MW should be allowed without granting access to something else.
Comment 1 Rainer Rillke @commons.wikimedia 2012-09-28 12:17:46 UTC
Terms of use: 
https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Wikimedia_Labs/Terms_of_use&oldid=531986
Comment 2 Ryan Lane 2012-09-28 17:00:05 UTC
Would you mind giving feedback on which terms you don't agree with?

It's very difficult to split the authentication, and we have no plans on doing so right now.
Comment 3 Ryan Lane 2012-09-28 17:16:41 UTC
The terms of use, in plain english, say that work must be wikimedia related, can't be illegal, must be open, and you can't release other people's privacy information, if its provided to you.

I don't see how we'd have any different terms for our Git repo.
Comment 4 Rainer Rillke @commons.wikimedia 2012-09-28 17:41:29 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
I accept this for Git. 

But not for a labs account. It does not only asks for everything must be open source but also "under an applicable creative commons license" and "OSI-approved open source licenses".

I kindly disagree with these terms. Or is it possible to create an account for both and than block the one on Labs?
Comment 5 Ryan Lane 2012-09-28 18:04:26 UTC
Code must be under an OSI approved license, content must be under an appropriate open content license. It may not necessarily be creative commons, we're looking at modifying that with text that properly clarifies that.

Of course, if you can't avoid putting proprietary code or content in Labs, you're free to just not use it. Unless you log in via SSH, you aren't using Labs. Also, you need to request shell access to be able to SSH in, so by default by having an account on Labsconsole, you can't directly use Labs.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links