Last modified: 2013-02-05 11:56:06 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T43024, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 41024 - log_page still not set for hundreds of images where it should
log_page still not set for hundreds of images where it should
Status: NEW
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2012-10-14 21:39 UTC by Platonides
Modified: 2013-02-05 11:56 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Platonides 2012-10-14 21:39:56 UTC
Bug 38606 made upload actions set log_page. It was deployed on 30 October.

Seeing some differences in the numbers of my tools (which rely on it), and the categories, I found that not all images have it set as they should.

For instance Rosenfeld-Isingen-Martinskirche105602.jpg, or דירי_המפציצים_הבריטיים.jpg.

mysql> select count(*) from logging where log_type='upload' and log_action='upload' and log_page=0 and log_timestamp > '20120831160000';
+----------+
| count(*) |
+----------+
|      831 |
+----------+


It may be just a wild apache which didn't get the code update. But as it is happening as of minutes ago (20121014211333), that's still relevant.
Comment 1 Sam Reed (reedy) 2012-10-14 21:44:13 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> It may be just a wild apache which didn't get the code update. But as it is
> happening as of minutes ago (20121014211333), that's still relevant.

Seems unlikely as we've been through 1.20wmf10, wmf11, wmf12, on 1.21wmf1 and 1.21wmf2 coming tomorrow...
Comment 2 Platonides 2012-10-17 17:39:24 UTC
Yes, quite unlikely, but how do you explain it? Where the update statements for those 831 images rollbacked?

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links