Last modified: 2012-12-13 11:35:27 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T43933, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 41933 - Incorrect number of active users
Incorrect number of active users
Status: VERIFIED WORKSFORME
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
1.21.x
All All
: Unprioritized normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2012-11-09 18:48 UTC by snaevar
Modified: 2012-12-13 11:35 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Screenshot that shows -1 active users (23.83 KB, image/png)
2012-11-13 13:05 UTC, snaevar 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description snaevar 2012-11-09 18:48:02 UTC 
The number of active users on Special:Statistics is way off. 
On the 31st of October the active users where 320, but Special:Statistics claimed that they where 2. 
And today, the number of active users are 631 but Special:Statistics claim that they are 388.
Comment 1 Daniel Kinzler 2012-11-11 21:32:12 UTC 
Perhaps Special:Statistics has a different idea of "active" than you do. I don't know how it counts, but I could imagine that it requires activity over a week or so.
Comment 2 snaevar 2012-11-13 13:05:23 UTC 
Created attachment 11349 [details]
Screenshot that shows -1 active users
Comment 3 snaevar 2012-11-13 13:06:07 UTC 
No, that is not the case. The number comes from counting the users on Special:ActiveUsers.

Anyway, this bug just got worse. Now Special:Statistics shows that the active users are -1. Added a screenshot and upped the importance to normal.
Comment 4 denny vrandecic 2012-12-13 11:35:17 UTC 
It currently seems to be correct. Please reopen or file a new bug if this happens again.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links