Last modified: 2013-04-15 17:14:19 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T44362, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 42362 - skipped item IDs
skipped item IDs
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
WikidataRepo (Other open bugs)
master
All All
: Unprioritized normal with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Wikidata bugs
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2012-11-22 15:06 UTC by Lydia Pintscher
Modified: 2013-04-15 17:14 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Lydia Pintscher 2012-11-22 15:06:10 UTC
After http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q50450 there are many skipped IDs. They're not deleted. Next page after Q50450 is Q50464.

What is going on?
Comment 1 merl 2012-11-22 23:24:18 UTC
Q50514 - Q50567 is missing, too.
Comment 2 Chong-Dae Park 2012-11-23 04:45:07 UTC
It could be a wikidata bug. "If an entry is posted via API and error occurs due to the interwiki conflict, new entry is not created. But new entry number is consumed and NEVER used again". These gap can be found other bot editings.
Comment 3 Daniel Kinzler 2012-11-23 09:45:29 UTC
It's true that IDs may be "swallowed" by unsuccessful attempts to create an item. But I don't see this as a problem. The IDs have no significance, they could just as well be chosen randomly instead of sequentially. The ID system may well be changed to something else entirely at some point, e.g. GUIDs.

I want to thank you for reporting this anyway, because it *might* have been an indication for Something Bad happening, like items just vanishing without a trace. But I don't see any evidence of that. So, closing WONTFIX.
Comment 4 Nemo 2013-04-15 08:14:59 UTC
From what I've heard, it's enough to visit Special:NewItem to "consume" an ID.
True, the only damage is that it hurts our milestones addiction. :)
Comment 5 Daniel Kinzler 2013-04-15 09:48:41 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> From what I've heard, it's enough to visit Special:NewItem to "consume" an
> ID.
> True, the only damage is that it hurts our milestones addiction. :)

That's not correct. But any attempt to create an entity will consume an ID, including failed attempts.
Comment 6 Daniel Kinzler 2013-04-15 09:50:07 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> That's not correct. 

Ok, let me rephrase that: if that was true, it would really be a bug, and one that should be fixed. But before filing a bug report, please make very sure that IDs are actually being consumed without any attempt to create anything.
Comment 7 jeblad 2013-04-15 12:58:41 UTC
It is possible to create through a "visit" to a link, but then the "link" must use a post request and contain a valid edit token for the user, so it must be created through a js-call.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links