Last modified: 2013-04-29 21:27:07 UTC
According to <https://test.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Version>, the VisualEditor extension is installed, but it doesn't seem to be enabled. I think VisualEditor should be enabled for all namespaces, all skins, all users, etc. on test.wikipedia.org.
Apparently there's interest in having VisualEditor enabled on test2.wikipedia.org as well (cf. <http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2012-December/065034.html>).
I believe Roan will be doing this later today.
I can see "Enable VisualEditor" checkbox at en.wikipedia.org[1] but not at test2.wikipedia.org[2]. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing [2] http://test2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing
http://test.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing allows to "Enable VisualEditor (only in the main and user namespaces)" http://test2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing does not offer enabling VisualEditor. Roan: As this is assigned to you, do you plan to work on this and is this high priority? If not, please reset. Thanks.
Related URL: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/61250 (Gerrit Change I98028df0bcb621e8f13a2f8ab130e86a9010ebeb)
(In reply to comment #5) > Related URL: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/61250 (Gerrit Change > I98028df0bcb621e8f13a2f8ab130e86a9010ebeb) This change enables VisualEditor on test2wiki, and will be deployed on Monday. I fixed the namespace configuration last week, it's now the same on all wikis: VisualEditor is enabled in the main and user namespaces, as well as the VisualEditor namespace where it exists (testwiki and mediawikiwiki have this namespace for historical reasons).
Related URL: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/61382 (Gerrit Change I56906c123e924b84eb9ee076cd67254f8935911d)
(In reply to comment #7) > Related URL: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/61382 (Gerrit Change > I56906c123e924b84eb9ee076cd67254f8935911d) Result of a typo. ^
Yeah; it would be helpful if gerrit changes which mentioned bugs were either always or never proxied by the bot to bugzilla, instead of the half-way house of being unknown. :-) Apologies, all! J.
(In reply to comment #9) > Yeah; it would be helpful if gerrit changes which mentioned bugs were either > always or never proxied by the bot to bugzilla, instead of the half-way house > of being unknown. :-) Feel free to file a new ticket with reference to bug 17322. :)
This is now deployed. Marking as fixed.
