Last modified: 2013-01-04 22:33:55 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T45548, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.

Bug 43548 - Suppressredirect for patrollers on dawiki


Summary:	Suppressredirect for patrollers on dawiki

Status:	RESOLVED INVALID

Product:	Wikimedia
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Site requests (Other open bugs)
Version:	wmf-deployment
Hardware:	All All

Importance:	Normal enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Dereckson

URL:	http://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedi...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:	community-consensus-needed

Depends on:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2013-01-01 00:29 UTC by Simeon Dahl
Modified:	2013-01-04 22:33 UTC (History)
CC List:	7 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser:	---
Mobile Platform:	---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Simeon Dahl 2013-01-01 00:29:55 UTC

Hi there. We at da.wikipedia have discussed about obtaining rights to the "patrollers". We have concluded that patrollers must be assigned "suppressredirect". I've linked to here: http://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Landsbybr%F8nden%23Flere_rettigheder_til_patruljanter%3F

Comment 1 MZMcBride 2013-01-01 00:31:45 UTC

I believe you want "Site requests", not "Wikidata". Updated the component accordingly and added the "shell" keyword.

Comment 2 Simeon Dahl 2013-01-01 00:54:41 UTC

(In reply to comment #1)
> I believe you want "Site requests", not "Wikidata". Updated the component
> accordingly and added the "shell" keyword.

Done! :) And happy new year.

Comment 3 Dereckson 2013-01-01 13:01:38 UTC

[ Taking this bug. Permanent link to consensus set as URL. ]

Comment 4 Ole Palnatoke Andersen 2013-01-01 14:11:44 UTC

(In reply to comment #3)
> [ Taking this bug. Permanent link to consensus set as URL. ]

Please hold your horses. There is not consensus about this request.

Comment 5 Dereckson 2013-01-01 14:26:37 UTC

[ -shell +shellpolicy ]

Comment 6 Snowolf 2013-01-02 13:25:25 UTC

I gave a quick peak at the discussion on dawiki thru google translate, for what it's worth, and it seems the initial closure was actually made by those who proposed it *headdesk* and that it has now been re-closed as no-consensus. Am I correct in my understanding of this (the re-closure as no-consensus)? If so, then we should mark this request as RESOLVED INVALID.

Comment 7 Christoffer G. Thomsen 2013-01-04 18:30:39 UTC

@Snowolf: Yes, that is the correct.

Comment 8 Dereckson 2013-01-04 18:52:21 UTC

The discussion is still going on. Let's wait a little more.

Comment 9 Christoffer G. Thomsen 2013-01-04 19:39:06 UTC

(In reply to comment #8)
> The discussion is still going on. Let's wait a little more.

Actually, they're just arguing about the debate and how person X spoke to person Y and so on, not discussing the actual topic.

Comment 10 Snowolf 2013-01-04 22:33:55 UTC

Indeed the discussion is no longer on the outcome or the issue. Marking this as invalid for lack of consensus.

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Search

Personal tools

Navigation

Links