Last modified: 2013-03-27 16:22:40 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T45887, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 43887 - Article Feedback - Satisfaction rating update
Article Feedback - Satisfaction rating update
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
ArticleFeedbackv5 (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Highest normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
: 38643 44829 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-01-11 22:18 UTC by Fabrice Florin
Modified: 2013-03-27 16:22 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Fabrice Florin 2013-01-11 22:18:25 UTC
The feedback page shows a 'satisfaction rating' with the percentage of people who 'found what they were looking for' in its related article. The current version of this rating is only based on the last 30 feedback posts, including posts that were resolved or hidden. This doesn't seem right.

We propose to change the formula for that 'satisfaction rating', to base it on all posts that have NOT been marked as 'resolved', 'inappropriate', 'hidden' or 'oversighted'. So this count would include unreviewed posts, as well as posts that were marked as 'useful' or 'no action needed'. We also propose to remove the current 30-post limit, because it is confusing, arbitrary and inconsistent with the posts that are being shown to users.

This request is also posted on this feature requirements page, where we may expand it as needed:

http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Article_feedback/Version_5/Feature_Requirements#Satisfaction_Rating
Comment 1 Matthias Mullie 2013-02-11 11:14:01 UTC
*** Bug 44829 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Matthias Mullie 2013-02-11 11:33:51 UTC
*** Bug 38643 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links