Last modified: 2013-01-18 19:21:00 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T46093, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 44093 - Check that the editor is actually new before tagging
Check that the editor is actually new before tagging
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
GettingStarted (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Unprioritized normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-01-18 08:15 UTC by Kunal Mehta (Legoktm)
Modified: 2013-01-18 19:21 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Kunal Mehta (Legoktm) 2013-01-18 08:15:32 UTC
After a discussion on IRC today about the new extension, an editor went out and edited an article through [[Special:GettingStarted]], and ended up having it tagged as a "new user getting started" (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gnanananda_Giri&diff=prev&oldid=533614552)

It might be useful to have a check to see whether the user is actually a new user (maybe check if autoconfirmed?) before tagging the edit.

I can imagine that there will be some users who will use [[Special:GettingStarted]] to find a quick task to do even if they aren't new, so it would be helpful to differentiate between the actual new editors.
Comment 1 Steven Walling 2013-01-18 19:21:00 UTC
The number of revisions not actually made by new users is so low that I don't think this is an issue worth revising the tagging code for. This is actually the only example I've seen, from examining the user ids of GettingStarted editors since we added the tag. The fact that this is very much an edge case, plus the fact that the threshold for "new" is very vague (5 edits? 10 edits? Autoconfirmed?), leads me to think we should hold off on making this change until it becomes really necessary.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links