Last modified: 2013-11-05 18:21:05 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T47093, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 45093 - Have a template system for descriptions
Have a template system for descriptions
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
WikidataRepo (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Lowest enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Wikidata bugs
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-02-17 11:26 UTC by Kunal Mehta (Legoktm)
Modified: 2013-11-05 18:21 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Kunal Mehta (Legoktm) 2013-02-17 11:26:57 UTC
When adding descriptions to items, many of them are the same thing like "river in Mexico". It would be more useful if there was a template-like system for this, so a user can just specify which template to use and the description is added.

The main advantage for this is translation. Once a new language is added to the template, it will show up for all items using that "template". Otherwise the current scenario is figure out which pages use the description, and have a bot add the translated version to all of those, over and over.

This spawned out of a discussion on my talk page: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Legoktm&oldid=6772762#bot_descriptions
Comment 1 Lydia Pintscher 2013-11-05 18:21:05 UTC
I have been thinking about this some more and I think we should not do this. Wikidata is already complex enough for people to understand. Involving templates in descriptions will just add even more complexity when we are actively trying to make everything easier. There has to be another way to do this.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links