Last modified: 2013-03-18 08:27:09 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T47340, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 45340 - [TUX] #. comments in gettext not displayed in translation helpers
[TUX] #. comments in gettext not displayed in translation helpers
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
Translate (Other open bugs)
master
All All
: High major (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Niklas Laxström
https://translatewiki.net/w/i.php?tit...
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-02-24 23:00 UTC by Siebrand Mazeland
Modified: 2013-03-18 08:27 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Siebrand Mazeland 2013-02-24 23:00:01 UTC
Tested with FUEL gettext files on translatewiki.net that have annotations for all strings. IIRC, in a chat with Niklas he said these should be displayed.
Comment 1 Niklas Laxström 2013-03-02 15:45:59 UTC
This might have been misdiagnosed. The code currently does not display filenames if code browser is not defined. Please try https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/51839
Comment 2 Siebrand Mazeland 2013-03-02 16:09:58 UTC
I'm not paricularly interested in the file names of the gettext comments. This is a single message, for which I'd like to see the "#." part displayed, not the "" part:

#. Applications: openoffice
#. Context: Open office – oowriter – View - Text Boundaries. Shows or hides the boundaries of the printable area of a page. The boundary lines are not printed.
msgid "Boundaries"
msgstr ""

According to http://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/manual/gettext.html#PO-Files, "#:" are references, #. are extracted comments. The extracted comments should be displayed regardless of the presence of a code browser definition, or is that an incorrect assumption?
Comment 3 Niklas Laxström 2013-03-05 16:07:52 UTC
Already started discussing with Santhosh how to separate the non-editable message documentation part from the editable part.
Comment 4 Niklas Laxström 2013-03-18 08:27:09 UTC
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/51839

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links