Last modified: 2013-11-04 15:02:08 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T48293, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 46293 - It is possible to enter the same statement twice
It is possible to enter the same statement twice
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
WikidataRepo (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Unprioritized normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Wikidata bugs
:
: 51365 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-03-18 18:37 UTC by Tom Morris
Modified: 2013-11-04 15:02 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Tom Morris 2013-03-18 18:37:23 UTC
On http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q838746 I managed to enter the same statement twice today (I have since reverted it).

Either the UI or the underlying database should not allow the same statement to be made more than once, since numerous statements are logically equivalent.

If I tell you that the author of 'Truth and Method' is Hans-Georg Gadamer, then I tell you again that the author of 'Truth and Method' is Hans-Georg Gadamer, I have taught you nothing new. Edits of this sort should fail.
Comment 1 Steven Rawson 2013-08-25 16:20:04 UTC
I'm not sure this bug is relevant now given the presence of qualifiers.

One use case that came up in a public forum was that we needed to specify that a particular building has been a distillery (or something of the sort) for two different periods of time. The only way to do that is to use the same statement twice, each statement using a qualifier as necessary.

This should probably be handled in the constraints system we've set up, for very particular properties.
Comment 2 Steven Rawson 2013-08-25 17:05:45 UTC
*** Bug 51365 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 swuensch 2013-08-26 02:35:41 UTC
I just wanted to inform everybody that my bot Sk!dbot removes double claims if they are exactly the same.
Comment 4 Lydia Pintscher 2013-11-04 15:02:08 UTC
As Steven said we need to allow this because of qualifiers.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links