Last modified: 2013-05-02 15:03:04 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T49876, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 47876 - [MLEB] 2013.04 is not compatible with MediaWiki 1.19 - jquery.jStorage is not available
[MLEB] 2013.04 is not compatible with MediaWiki 1.19 - jquery.jStorage is not...
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
UniversalLanguageSelector (Other open bugs)
REL1_19-branch
All All
: Unprioritized normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2013-04-30 13:35 UTC by Amir E. Aharoni
Modified: 2013-05-02 15:03 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Amir E. Aharoni 2013-04-30 13:35:32 UTC 
2013.04 is not compatible with MediaWiki 1.19 - jquery.jStorage is not available.
Comment 1 Siebrand Mazeland 2013-04-30 13:42:40 UTC 
Compatibility for 1.19 was dropped.
Comment 2 Niklas Laxström 2013-05-02 04:54:55 UTC 
/me sad.

We never had a well working release for the "LTS" 1.19.
Comment 3 Nemo 2013-05-02 06:00:56 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> We never had a well working release for the "LTS" 1.19.

Rather, we never had any MLEB release targeting 1.19 at all. Best thing to do is probably testing (and if necessary updating) the 1.19 branches used by ExtensionDistributor. Open a new bug for that?
Comment 4 Niklas Laxström 2013-05-02 13:59:39 UTC 
I think we are not supporting multiple things, so those RELXX branches in extension distributor are of no interest to us.
Comment 5 Nemo 2013-05-02 15:03:04 UTC 
(In reply to comment #4)
> I think we are not supporting multiple things, so those RELXX branches in
> extension distributor are of no interest to us.

What's the connection? If the RELX_YY branches pick the wrong revision, they'll never be changed?
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links