Last modified: 2013-07-25 09:36:49 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T52031, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 50031 - revisions need to be scrubbed from the English Wikipedia database
revisions need to be scrubbed from the English Wikipedia database
Status: NEW
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Site requests (Other open bugs)
wmf-deployment
All All
: Normal normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
: shell
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-06-23 02:06 UTC by Graham87
Modified: 2013-07-25 09:36 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Graham87 2013-06-23 02:06:44 UTC
Please scrub the 2002 and 2003 edits from:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sandbox
I.e. these edits:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sandbox&offset=20040101000000&limit=100&action=history&tagfilter=

I accidentally imported them there by file uploading last night. Not only that, but I also forgot to change the usernames so they're under Wikipedians' old usernames. The edits are duplicated (under the correct usernames!) at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Historical_archive/Earliest_sandbox_history

Another reason to remove these edits (besides the fact that they're plain ugly) is that users of automated tools sometimes use the sandbox to test speedy deletion warnings. These automated tools automatically place the speedy deletion notice on the talk page of the first contributor to the page. There is no reason to bombard the user "I am Jack's username" (either in his former or current username) with these notices.
Comment 1 db [inactive,noenotif] 2013-06-23 18:14:53 UTC
Deleting the version by delete the whole page and restore the other revisions should be enough. I hope nobody will delete revisions physically.
Comment 2 MZMcBride 2013-06-23 18:18:39 UTC
Sigh.
Comment 3 Graham87 2013-06-24 00:33:00 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Sigh.
Exactly. This is more than a little embarrassing. If only we had revision move (bug 21312) ...

@db: Deletion and restoration will cause Bad Things (TM) to happen to the database and should absolutely *not* be done:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_stocks#Scientizzle_for_the_Baby_and_Bathwater_award

There are actually a number of these cases on a smaller scale caused by transwiki imports (a few of mine by accident, many by someone else who didn't know any better):
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&offset=20050201000000&limit=36&tagfilter=&contribs=user&target=Conversion+script&namespace=

But these need handling on a case-by-case basis.

And not all of Conversion script's edits display in Special:Cpontributions (which you'd notice if you'd click on the next button) because of bug 34873 ...
Comment 4 Sam Reed (reedy) 2013-06-27 19:56:13 UTC
I wonder if the deleteOldRevisions.php maintenance script would be enough to fix this issue...

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links