Last modified: 2014-06-26 23:13:12 UTC
In the Reference editor we have two fields: "Re-use by this name" "Use this group" These names are useless for new editors (too cryptic and unclear - what is "re-use"? a verb? referring to what?) and also unhelpful for established users (they need to know that these are totally identical to the name="" and group="" attributes). It is also not clear that they are only occasionally needed. Something simpler, like "Reference name (optional)" and "Reference group (optional)" could be better. Same in the Reference list editor: "Use this group" -> "Display references belonging to this group (optional)"
There is also a request in that discussion about whether "Transclusion" could be renamed to something in plain English, like "Templates".
(In reply to comment #1) > There is also a request in that discussion about whether "Transclusion" could > be renamed to something in plain English, like "Templates". The problem is that they aren't just templates - there are also magic words and parser functions as well, like Wikidata invocations or other oddities that MediaWiki supports. Lumping them all in as templates makes things much harder to explain in documentation.
