Last modified: 2014-03-18 19:21:12 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T52206, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 50206 - VisualEditor: No loading animation when editing a section deep down a page
VisualEditor: No loading animation when editing a section deep down a page
Status: ASSIGNED
Product: VisualEditor
Classification: Unclassified
MediaWiki integration (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Editing team bugs – take if you're interested!
:
: 51785 51830 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-06-26 01:23 UTC by This, that and the other (TTO)
Modified: 2014-03-18 19:21 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description This, that and the other (TTO) 2013-06-26 01:23:48 UTC
For example, try clicking [edit] at [[Glossary of chess#G]]. The text just goes gray, there is no indication that anything is happening.

This is because the progress indicator always appears at the top of the page.
Comment 1 James Forrester 2013-06-26 03:27:14 UTC
Argh, missed this one in the bunch of other fixes; sorry. Thanks for the spot!
Comment 2 Bartosz Dziewoński 2013-09-17 16:51:08 UTC
*** Bug 51785 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 James Forrester 2013-11-25 13:58:46 UTC
*** Bug 51830 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Alex Monk 2014-02-03 02:57:48 UTC
So we just want to fix the loading bar at a certain position on the screen?

I'm thinking of something like this in modules/ve-mw/init/styles/ve.init.mw.ViewPageTarget.css under ".ve-init-mw-viewPageTarget-loading {":

-       float: right;
+       position: fixed;
+       right: 5%;
+       top: 16%;
Comment 5 Ed Sanders 2014-02-05 23:26:17 UTC
Seems reasonable, although we might want to make it stand out against non-flat-white backgrounds.
Comment 6 James Forrester 2014-02-05 23:46:02 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> Seems reasonable, although we might want to make it stand out against
> non-flat-white backgrounds.

Put it in with a pure-white background with a 2px margin, then? Maybe Trevor has a view re. design?
Comment 7 Alex Monk 2014-02-06 20:47:51 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > Seems reasonable, although we might want to make it stand out against
> > non-flat-white backgrounds.
> 
> Put it in with a pure-white background with a 2px margin, then? Maybe Trevor
> has a view re. design?

I tried this but it still appeared over the top of text. :/

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links