Last modified: 2013-11-25 11:57:07 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T53183, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 51183 - VisualEditor: Design of the reference re-use pane is confusing, with a bold "Use an existing source" title that doesn't look like one
VisualEditor: Design of the reference re-use pane is confusing, with a bold "...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: VisualEditor
Classification: Unclassified
Editing Tools (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Unprioritized normal
: VE-deploy-2013-08-15
Assigned To: Trevor Parscal
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2013-07-11 17:05 UTC by Maggie Dennis
Modified: 2013-11-25 11:57 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Maggie Dennis 2013-07-11 17:05:05 UTC 
Unclear why the second option is bolded. An editor on English Wikipedia suggests that if only one of them is going to be bolded (create new source/use an existing source), it should be the other way around.
Comment 1 James Forrester 2013-11-25 11:57:07 UTC 
This was fixed some months ago in the re-work of the transclusion dialog; sorry for the slowness of reply.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links