Last modified: 2014-06-30 13:33:48 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T54681, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 52681 - Enable blocking feature of AbuseFilter on meta
Enable blocking feature of AbuseFilter on meta
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Site requests (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
: shell
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-08-09 20:05 UTC by Barras
Modified: 2014-06-30 13:33 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Barras 2013-08-09 20:05:59 UTC
Hello,

there has been a discussion on meta to enable the blocking option of the AbuseFilter extension to help the admins.

Discussion can be found here (with consensus to enable that feature): http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meta:Babel&oldid=5712966#Allow_Meta-Wiki_AbuseFilter_to_block_as_option

Please add the option to have the AbuseFilter blocking users if triggered.

Thanks!

[[m:User:Barras]]
Comment 1 This, that and the other (TTO) 2013-08-13 07:20:46 UTC
So:

elseif ( $wgDBname == 'metawiki' ) {
	$wgAbuseFilterAvailableActions[] = 'block';
...
}

But I am worried that it might affect the global abuse filter system as well as local Meta filters. Chris?
Comment 2 Chris Steipp 2013-08-13 18:57:06 UTC
Correct, it would be available as a global action, as well as locally to meta.

I trust that the stewards wouldn't add a global rule that blocked, unless there was very good reason for it.
Comment 3 Jasper Deng 2013-08-13 19:12:05 UTC
With the global filter in testing-only mode at this time, it probably would be fine.

However, in the long run, we can only hope for the global filter to be deployed across all wikis if we separate the global abuse filter settings from local. It appears to be the community's opinion that the global abuse filter should never be able to do restricted actions like blocking.
Comment 4 MF-Warburg 2013-08-16 01:11:41 UTC
Whether global filters should block can be decided later, when a policy about global abusefilters is made. And even if it's decided to not use the block function in global filters, stewards are hopefully trusted enough to simply not use it then.
Comment 5 This, that and the other (TTO) 2013-08-17 09:32:17 UTC
OK, I suppose we can proceed with this, per MF-Warburg. Stewards are trusted/expected not to create global filters that use the "block" action, and this should be communicated to them somehow.
Comment 6 Gerrit Notification Bot 2013-08-17 09:32:45 UTC
Change 79458 had a related patch set uploaded by TTO:
Enable "block" action for AbuseFilter on meta

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/79458
Comment 7 MF-Warburg 2013-08-17 22:40:22 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> OK, I suppose we can proceed with this, per MF-Warburg. Stewards are
> trusted/expected not to create global filters that use the "block" action,
> and
> this should be communicated to them somehow.

It has been discussed on the stewards' mailing list.
Comment 8 Gerrit Notification Bot 2013-08-21 15:44:48 UTC
Change 79458 merged by jenkins-bot:
Enable "block" action for AbuseFilter on meta

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/79458
Comment 9 This, that and the other (TTO) 2013-08-21 23:49:22 UTC
Done.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links