Last modified: 2013-08-13 10:11:12 UTC
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ResetTokens Current HTML: --- <table><tbody> <tr class="mw-htmlform-field-HTMLMultiSelectField"><td class="mw-label"><label>Tokens:</label></td><td class="mw-input"> <div class="mw-htmlform-flatlist-item"><input name="wptokens[]" type="checkbox" value="watchlisttoken" id="mw-input-wptokens-watchlisttoken" /> <label for="mw-input-wptokens-watchlisttoken">Watchlist web feed token (current value: z0050e875795edd56864bdfef28a0000ec00046g)</label></div> </td></tr> </tbody></table> --- I think this is strange markup to use, given that this is a pretty standard list. The visual output looks something like this: Tokens: [ ] Watchlist web feed token (current value: z0050e875795edd56864bdfef28a0000ec00046g) I don't see any reason to use an HTML table here; using an unordered list seems much more semantic and sensible.
That's what HTMLMultiSelectField does. The same markup is used all over the place, e.g. on [[Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets]], but I guess looks a little sillier here since this is a form with only one field that only has one option. Also, you've just revealed your watchlist token (unless you doctored that value), which the Preferences page specifically advises against. Good job! :P
(In reply to comment #1) > That's what HTMLMultiSelectField does. The same markup is used all over the > place, e.g. on [[Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets]], but I guess > looks a little sillier here since this is a form with only one field that > only has one option. Hrmph. Perhaps this should be a more generic bug, then? > Also, you've just revealed your watchlist token (unless you doctored that > value), which the Preferences page specifically advises against. Good job! :P I'm not sure many hashes contain the letter Z. ;-) It's not my real token.
(In reply to comment #2) > Hrmph. Perhaps this should be a more generic bug, then? It would appear so.