Last modified: 2013-08-31 21:33:18 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T54933, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 52933 - Easy access to component's project and code locations
Easy access to component's project and code locations
Status: NEW
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Bugzilla (Other open bugs)
wmf-deployment
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on: 43806
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-08-16 17:19 UTC by Greg Grossmeier
Modified: 2013-08-31 21:33 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Greg Grossmeier 2013-08-16 17:19:30 UTC
Problem:
I'm looking at a bug about an extension I'm not completely familiar with. It has it's own bugzilla component. I want to learn more about it, usually by going to it's mediawiki.org page and/or it's gerrit repo.

Solution:
Lets tie the things together! BZ should "know" about those other things ("Project pages" and "code review") per component/whatever and provide that information to the user.
Comment 1 Andre Klapper 2013-08-19 09:27:41 UTC
In some cases you can click the "Component:" link above and then scroll to the component to check if it has a link to some kind of "homepage". Especially for extensions this is often true (though I have not fixed all dumb descriptions like "Foobar: The Foobar extension. (No further info, go find out yourself!)".

However, seeing the structure in Git/Gerrit (e.g. extensions/*), it's impossible to make any automated assumptions. 
Personally I'm waiting for CommunityMetrics to provide some mapping between {Bugzilla products/components, Gerrit repositories, Extension homepages, etc}, and my boring fallback idea would be using DOAP files for this. In both cases some code would be required to gather such info and display it in Bugzilla. Hmm.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links