Last modified: 2013-10-18 20:08:28 UTC
(sorry if this is a known one, I couldn't find a match). Being a sysop at it.wp, I was able to take a look at a version of http://it.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Pareri_su_Wikipedia&action=history that Rojelio undid and hid yesterday. Today I opened http://it.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Pareri_su_Wikipedia&feed=rss&action=history in my Sage Rss Reader on FF (not with the browser) and I am actually able to see the hidden data.
It's either because you're a sysop, or because your reader has cached that revision earlier, when it wasn't deleted.
(In reply to comment #1) > It's either because you're a sysop, or because your reader has cached that > revision earlier, when it wasn't deleted. Hmm. Does this make this bug report invalid?
I might do some tests ASAP. I do recall that Sage did not allow me to access pages on restricted wikis (like the OTRS one) if I had not logged in there, but I can't verify this right now.
(In reply to comment #2) > Hmm. Does this make this bug report invalid? Only assuming I'm right, I haven't tested anything (apart from ensuring that I personally can't see the deleted revision in RSS source).
Also, if it's because of sysop right, I'm not sure if the feeds shouldn't always render as if the user was anonymous, unless we come up with some solution similar to how we use a token for watchlist feeds.
Confirming it must because I am a sysop, can't see anything if I am logged out or if I log in with a common user account. If this is how it should work, please close this bug. I am going to mention this on a few help pages though, so it won't surprise anyone in the future. Thanks.
This looks like the expected behavior to me.
