Last modified: 2013-10-04 23:43:13 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T56371, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 54371 - VisualEditor: Some templates with images show full size images on Swedish Wikipedia
VisualEditor: Some templates with images show full size images on Swedish Wik...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 51628
Product: VisualEditor
Classification: Unclassified
ContentEditable (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Unprioritized major
: ---
Assigned To: Inez Korczyński
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-09-20 10:12 UTC by Jan Ainali
Modified: 2013-10-04 23:43 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Jan Ainali 2013-09-20 10:12:45 UTC
In some templates (e.g. Template:Infobox fornminne) on Swedish Wikipedia, the image in it is shown in full size when you enter VE. 

Article: https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%B6dermanlands_runinskrifter_305
Screencast: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/8363895/out-8.ogv

It does not behave like that for all templates though. In an article with Template:Kommunfakta is seems to work fine. E.g. https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botkyrka_kommun

Behaviour is observed from two different users and in both Firefox and Chromium.
Comment 1 Chris McKenna 2013-09-24 12:14:54 UTC
Could this be bug 51628? i.e. an image size being specified as e.g. "250px" in a field that is expecting e.g. "250"

It seems very likely but I can't read the Swedish source code to check.
Comment 2 Jan Ainali 2013-09-24 12:42:08 UTC
Yes probably, I did did this change: 

https://sv.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mall:Infobox_fornminne&diff=prev&oldid=23823659

and now it seems to behave correctly in articles using that template. If I find the same error on other articles, I'll try to se if this is it first.
Comment 3 Chris McKenna 2013-10-04 23:43:13 UTC
Given the above comment and lack of further reports, I'm marking this as a duplicate of bug 51628

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 51628 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links