Last modified: 2013-10-25 17:50:17 UTC
I've been reading bug 45051, caressing my ego, when I noticed… Below bug 45051 comment 6, InlineHistory claims that MZMcBride marked a bug as a duplicate of that one. This is not true; Krinkle did that in comment 5, and MZMcBride only quoted the automatic comment. The only explanation I see is that InlineHistory "marked as a duplicate" detection is too eager. It should only trigger when that comment is at the end of the comment, in a separate paragraph.
Interesting. Probably should go upstream as I didn't change any code. Only slightly related ticket I could find was https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=759768
Upstreamed as https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=928387
I (or anybody) need to create a similar testcase (bug report) on http://boogs.wmflabs.org and then apply https://bug928387.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=819545 on http://boogs.wmflabs.org to test if it fixes the issue.
Change 91362 had a related patch set uploaded by Aklapper: Fix InlineHistory's "marked as a duplicate" detection being too eager https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/91362
Change 91362 merged by Dzahn: Fix InlineHistory's "marked as a duplicate" detection being too eager https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/91362
this has been deployed.
Thank you! The issue described in comment 0 is fixed now.