Last modified: 2013-11-27 21:53:11 UTC
Go to http://ee-flow.wmflabs.org/wiki/Talk:Sandbox and click on the timestamp for the top topic on the page. Instead of being taken to the history, you'll just see the topic collapse/uncollapse.
The WMF core features team tracks this bug on Mingle card https://mingle.corp.wikimedia.org/projects/flow/cards/464, but people from the community are welcome to contribute here and in Gerrit.
This is a feature, rather than a bug. Although perhaps a feature we don't want. We only generate a history link if something has happened beyond the initial topic creation.
It's really confusing for it to link/not link. IMO the timestamp should always link to history, but the missing title tooltip on the link in this case should be "Topic history (empty)" There is a history for this new topic, http://ee-flow.wmflabs.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sandbox&workflow=05094f5502cb34dffb6efa163e68c4ac&action=topic-history
What does a user expect to see if they click on the timestamp on a newly made topic with no edits and/or replies? If it's just repeated info on the newly made topic, we should think about not making it a link. But I can see how making it a link regardless of no edits/replies should happen for the sake of consistency. In that case just show as it is with other post histories, it's just going to be sparse. I believe the user will know what to expect to see, unless if I'm unaware of other expectancies.
The WMF core features team tracks this bug on Mingle card https://mingle.corp.wikimedia.org/projects/flow/cards/468, but people from the community are welcome to contribute here and in Gerrit.
Change 96674 had a related patch set uploaded by Bsitu: Timestamp should always take user to history page https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/96674
Change 96674 merged by jenkins-bot: Timestamp should always take user to history page https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/96674
