Last modified: 2013-12-19 20:25:47 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T60103, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 58103 - it.wikinews : request for $wgAbuseFilterAvailableActions[] = 'block'
it.wikinews : request for $wgAbuseFilterAvailableActions[] = 'block'
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Site requests (Other open bugs)
wmf-deployment
All All
: Low enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
: shell
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-12-06 17:05 UTC by Codicorumus
Modified: 2013-12-19 20:25 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Codicorumus 2013-12-06 17:05:50 UTC
it.wikinews : request for $wgAbuseFilterAvailableActions[] = 'block' 

----

Please, in wmf-config/abusefilter.php

(https://git.wikimedia.org/blob/operations%2Fmediawiki-config.git/HEAD/wmf-config%2Fabusefilter.php)

inside

    // Custom permissions
    switch ( $wgDBname ) {
    ...

could you add a case for it.wikinews

    case 'itwikinews':
        $wgAbuseFilterAvailableActions[] = 'block';
        $wgAbuseFilterBlockDuration = '24 hours';
        break;

We don't have 24/24 surveillance and so --without the automatic block-- a stubborn spammer can too easily try to cheat a filter.

We have discussed the issue in

https://it.wikinews.org/wiki/Wikinotizie:Richieste_agli_amministratori#Blocco_automatico_per_AbuseFilter

we were only me and a global sysop. If more consensus is needed, maybe I can try to gain it via a discussion in a more general venue -- it will not be a crowd anyway :-) we're just a few active editors and the issue is way too technical for the average editor.
Comment 1 Tomasz W. Kozlowski 2013-12-06 17:13:11 UTC
Yes, please try to get a few more editors comment on this, two people agreeing on this particular issue (which is considered quite controversial for some) is definitely too few. Thanks in advance :-)
Comment 2 Codicorumus 2013-12-06 18:40:47 UTC
Ok. I've opened a new discussion at the Bar -- our Village pump.

https://it.wikinews.org/wiki/Wikinotizie:Bar/Attivazione_del_blocco_automatico_per_AbuseFilter

I'll post again here when a clear consensus will emerge there or the discussion anyhow is ended.

Thanks for your quick reply.
Comment 3 Codicorumus 2013-12-19 16:51:49 UTC
The discussion in

https://it.wikinews.org/wiki/Wikinotizie:Bar/Attivazione_del_blocco_automatico_per_AbuseFilter

is now stalling. We have 8 supporting comments --myself included-- and no one opposing.

Last comment was posted on 13-dec-2013 and --I think-- no more are likely to come within one or two weeks. The discussion was linked in project's home-page and advertised by a MassMessage sent to all 7 sysops and to 10 more users, the ones in Special:Activeusers with 4 or more edits, excluded bots and users with only interwiki or user-space edits.

I think we have more or less reached the full consensus allowed by the project's small amount of editing.

Suggestions are welcome -- if you have any to share.

Thanks for your attention.
Comment 4 Gerrit Notification Bot 2013-12-19 18:31:43 UTC
Change 102728 had a related patch set uploaded by Odder:
Enable AbuseFilter block option on itwikinews

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/102728
Comment 5 Gerrit Notification Bot 2013-12-19 18:57:45 UTC
Change 102728 merged by jenkins-bot:
Enable AbuseFilter block option on itwikinews

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/102728
Comment 6 Codicorumus 2013-12-19 20:25:47 UTC
Thanks!

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links